The Equality Act 2010 provides that your employer can't treat you less favourably than others because of your marital status. You will be protected against discrimination on this ground if you are married or if you have entered into a civil partnership, but not if you are single.
The Equality Act 2010 protects you whether you are an employee, a former employee or an applicant for a job. You will also be protected if you are a worker, partner or office-holder.
Discrimination in the workplace is unlawful in all aspects of employment, including the recruitment process, status, training, promotion and transfer opportunities, redundancy, dismissal and even post-employment.
In some cases, however, a job can be offered to someone of a particular marital status without it amounting to unlawful discrimination, if there is a genuine 'occupational requirement'.
This is where your employer treats you less favourably because of your marital status when compared with another worker who is not married or in a civil partnership and who shares the same or similar (but not materially different) circumstances as you (known as a 'comparator').
The comparator's circumstances do not need to be identical to yours (in terms of the type of job, job level, job experience and seniority, etc.) but must not be wholly dissimilar. If you cannot find a suitable comparator then a 'hypothetical comparator' can be used instead, who would be deemed to have the same employment as you (such as your title, role, level, etc.). An Employment Tribunal has the power to decide the particular circumstances of a hypothetical comparator (such as their personality).
For example it could be direct discrimination if a single person, who has the same experience and qualifications as yourself, is promoted instead of you simply because he/she is single while you are married or in a civil partnership.
Your employer could be liable for a direct discrimination claim even if there was no intention to discriminate against you.
Your employer can't defend a direct discrimination claim by justifying it (arguing that their actions were a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim). The only defence would be to prove that there was no discrimination.
This will occur where certain working practices, provisions or criteria which apply to all employees, place some employees at a particular disadvantage compared to other workers because of their marital status. A worker within that disadvantaged group must also actually suffer that particular disadvantage.
Indirect discrimination would not be unlawful if your employer can justify it by showing that the working practices, provisions or criteria which are being applied are a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim.
Your employer could be held liable for indirect discrimination even if they did not intend to discriminate against you.
Victimisation happens when you are being treated less favourably because:
If an employer reasonably thinks that a group of its workers who share a protected characteristic (race, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, disability or religion or belief) either...
Employers are allowed to provide special training to members of the group. They can also encourage members of the group to apply to do particular work or fill posts (for example, by saying that applications from them will be particularly welcome).
This does not mean that employers can discriminate in favour of the members of the group when it comes to choosing people to do the work or fill the posts, unless they meet the circumstances described below under 'Positive action in recruitment and for promotions', as that could be unlawful discrimination.
Positive action is not the same as 'positive discrimination', which is where members of a particular group who have a protected characteristic are treated more favourably regardless of the circumstances.
The Equality Act 2010 makes it lawful for employers to take positive action when recruiting and making internal promotions in order to overcome a disadvantage connected with a protected characteristic or where the inclusion of people with the protected characteristic in a particular activity is disproportionately low. Employers will be able take positive action where all of the following apply:
Further guidance on positive action can be obtained from the.
Positive discrimination is unlawful except if used when recruiting or promoting individuals in the limited circumstances described above.
If you think that you're suffering from discrimination at work, you should talk to your employer and explain why you feel discriminated against. If necessary, put your complaint in writing. An employee representative (such as a trade union official) may be able to help you. Your employer may have an equal opportunities policy - ask to see it.
If this doesn't help, you should make a complaint using your employer's grievance procedure. If your employer doesn't have a grievance procedure, you should set out your complaint in a letter and hand it to your line manager. If your line manager is the problem, then hand your letter to your HR manager or the person your line manager reports to. Your employer should then arrange a grievance meeting with you. If the outcome of the meeting is unsatisfactory, you have the right to appeal to a manager who was not previously involved in your grievance. For more information, see our article on grievance procedures in.
If you're still unhappy, you can, in certain cases, apply to an Employment Tribunal. Before you do this you must obtain legal advice. You need to apply within three months of the act of discrimination taking place. If the discrimination extends over a period, you must bring your claim to the Employment Tribunal within 3 months from the end of that period. It is advisable to obtain legal advice if you wish to proceed with a claim to an Employment Tribunal.
See thefor more information on marital status discrimination. Acas offers free, confidential and impartial advice on all employment rights issues.