It's against the law for an employer to discriminate against you because of your actual or perceived religion or philosophical beliefs, or because of your association with someone with a particular religion or philosophical belief. It is also unlawful to discriminate against you because you are not religious or you have an absence of religious or philosophical beliefs.
The Equality Act 2010 defines 'religion' or 'belief' as any religion, religious belief or philosophical belief. There is no definitive list of recognised religions. To be recognised as a religion, there must be a clear structure and belief system, although if it is not recognised as a religion it may still be recognised as a philosophical belief.
This happens where you are treated less favourably than another worker because of your own religion or beliefs when compared with another worker of a different religion or belief but who otherwise shares the same or similar (but not materially different) circumstances as you (known as a 'comparator').
The comparator's circumstances do not need to be identical to yours (in terms of the type of job, job level, job experience and seniority, etc.) but they must not be wholly dissimilar. If you cannot find a suitable comparator, then a 'hypothetical comparator' can be used instead, who would be deemed to have the same employment as you (such as your title, role, level, etc.). An Employment Tribunal has the power to decide the particular circumstances of a hypothetical comparator (such as their personality).
The law also extends to protecting you if your employer treats you less favourably based on:
Your employer can't defend a claim of direct religious discrimination by justifying it (arguing that their actions were a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim).
There is, however, an exception whereby direct discrimination is allowed in circumstances where it is required in order to comply with another law, or a genuine occupational requirement. For example, a Roman Catholic school may be able to restrict applications for a scripture teacher to baptized Catholics.
Usually, the only available defence to a direct discrimination claim is proving that there was no discrimination.
This is where formal or informal working practices, provisions or criteria that your employer applies equally to all workers, puts a group of workers who share the same particular religion or belief at a particular disadvantage when compared with other workers and you also suffer that particular disadvantage.
It does not matter whether or not this has been done intentionally. For example, if your employer introduced a dress code which requires all workers to go bare headed, then those who are Sikhs (and who have to wear turbans as part of their faith) would be discriminated against and would potentially have grounds for an indirect discrimination claim.
Your employer can defend against indirect discrimination claims by justifying the use of the unlawful practice, provisions or criteria, if it can show that its application is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
Harassment is unwanted conduct towards a worker by an employer or another worker, because of that worker's actual or perceived religion or beliefs, or association with someone of a particular religion or belief. This applies to any conduct that violates a worker's dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, humiliating, degrading or offensive environment, even if it was not intended as such.
For example, if your employer makes remarks about your or someone else's religion, which you or anyone else feels are hostile, your employer could be liable for harassment.
Workers who are not the subject of the unwanted conduct will also be able to make harassment claims for behaviour that they find offensive, even if they themselves do not have a protected characteristic.
Furthermore the unwanted conduct will be harassment even where it was not intended to be harassing. If it is reasonable to regard the unwanted conduct as having a harassing effect, it will be unlawful. Note that you will not be protected by the regulations if you are over sensitive and unreasonably take offence to an innocent comment.
Employers will be liable for any acts of harassment undertaken by their employees in the course of their employment – whether they knew about it or not – if they fail to take reasonable steps to prevent it. 'In the course of employment' means 'done to you whilst at work' or 'done to you while 'in a workplace-related environment'. Employers can't defend a claim of harassment by showing that they did not authorise it, or on the grounds that the actions were reasonable or warranted.
An employer can, however, escape liability for harassment, if it took reasonably practicable steps to prevent it.
You have the right not to be bullied or made fun of at work or in a work-related setting because of your religion or beliefs. You may also be protected if you're bullied in the mistaken belief that you're a member of a particular religion. For example, following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, some Sikhs suffered abuse because they were mistakenly thought to be Muslims.
For more information, see our section ''.
Victimisation happens when you are being treated less favourably because:
If an employer reasonably thinks that a group of its workers who share a protected characteristic (race, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, disability or religion or belief) either...
Employers are allowed to provide special training to members of the group. They can also encourage members of the group to apply to do particular work or fill posts (for example, by saying that applications from them will be particularly welcome).
This does not mean that employers can discriminate in favour of the members of the group when it comes to choosing people to do the work or fill the posts, unless they meet the circumstances described below under 'Positive action in recruitment and for promotions', as that could be unlawful discrimination.
Positive action is not the same as 'positive discrimination', which is where members of a particular group who have a protected characteristic are treated more favourably regardless of the circumstances.
The Equality Act 2010 makes it lawful for employers to take positive action when recruiting and making internal promotions in order to overcome a disadvantage connected with a protected characteristic or where the inclusion of people with the protected characteristic in a particular activity is disproportionately low. Employers will be able take positive action where all of the following apply:
Further guidance on positive action can be obtained from the.
Positive discrimination is unlawful except if used when recruiting or promoting individuals in the limited circumstances described above.
If you think you've been discriminated against because of your religion or belief or you have a religious requirement that isn't being met, you can talk to:
If possible, try to resolve the matter informally, but if not, you can follow your employer's grievance procedure. If your employer doesn't have a grievance procedure, you should set out your complaint in a letter and hand it to your line manager. If your line manager is the problem, then hand your letter to your HR manager or your line manager's supervisor. Your employer should then arrange a grievance meeting with you. If the outcome of the meeting is unsatisfactory, you have the right to appeal to a manager who was not previously involved in your grievance. For more information, see our article onin England, Wales and Scotland.
As a last resort, you can apply to an Employment Tribunal. You must take legal advice before doing so. Your application must be lodged within three months of the act of discrimination taking place. If the discrimination extends over a period, you must bring your claim within 3 months from the end of that period.
See thefor employers and employees in respect of religion or belief and the workplace. Acas offers free, confidential and impartial advice on all employment rights issues.